The Nativity Narrative and the Hebrew Scriptures: A Jewish Perspective

Introduction

Every December, millions of Christians celebrate the nativity story found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. Central to that celebration is the belief that Jesus’ birth fulfilled ancient prophecies recorded in the Hebrew Bible. From a Jewish perspective, however, many of the passages cited in support of the nativity narrative are understood very differently.

This article does not seek to criticize Christianity or diminish the significance these beliefs hold for Christians. Rather, it examines several key passages frequently cited in the nativity accounts and explains why traditional Judaism does not regard them as prophecies concerning Jesus. The discussion focuses primarily on the Gospel of Matthew, which repeatedly appeals to the Hebrew Scriptures in an effort to establish Jesus as the promised Messiah.

Genealogies of Jesus

Matthew 1:1–17 and Luke 3:23–38 both provide genealogies for Jesus. Both Matthew and Luke present genealogies intended to connect Jesus to King David. Establishing Davidic ancestry is important because Jewish tradition expects the Messiah to descend from the line of David.

However, when carefully comparing the two genealogies, they differ substantially from one another. Matthew traces Jesus’ ancestry through one line of David’s descendants, while Luke presents a different lineage. Christian commentators have proposed numerous explanations for these differences, including the suggestion that one genealogy represents Joseph’s ancestry and the other Mary’s. Yet both texts explicitly connect the genealogy to Joseph.

From a Jewish perspective, the issue becomes more complicated when combined with the doctrine of the virgin birth. If Jesus was not Joseph’s biological son, questions naturally arise concerning how Davidic lineage would be transmitted. In the Hebrew Bible, tribal and dynastic inheritance is generally traced through the father. Consequently, traditional Judaism does not regard the genealogies as establishing Jesus’ qualifications as the promised Davidic king.

Misquotes & Misinterpretations within the Book of Matthew

From a Jewish perspective, the authors of the various books throughout the “New” Testament tend to grossly misquote the “Old” Testament starting with the nativity narrative. [Note: Throughout my articles, I tend to put “Old” and “New” in quotes when referring to the alleged Testaments because I object to Christianity defining the Jewish text as old, as it infers “out with the old in the with the new” while propagating replacement theology, a dangerous and erroneous perspective.]

(i) Isaiah 7:14 and the Virgin Birth

Perhaps the most well-known prophecy cited in the nativity narrative is Isaiah 7:14. Matthew 1:23 presents this verse as predicting the virgin birth of Jesus.

When read within the broader context of Isaiah 7, however, the prophet is addressing King Ahaz during a military and political crisis in the eighth century BCE. Isaiah offers a sign intended to reassure the king concerning events that would occur in his own generation. For this reason, Jewish commentators understand the prophecy as referring to circumstances contemporary with Isaiah rather than to events centuries in the future.

The Hebrew text also uses the word almah, which traditionally means a young woman of marriageable age. While such a woman may be a virgin, the word itself does not specifically mean “virgin.” Had Isaiah intended to emphasize virginity, other Hebrew terms were available. As a result, Judaism does not view Isaiah 7:14 as a messianic prophecy or as a prediction of a miraculous birth.

(ii) Bethlehem and Micah 5:2

Matthew 2:6 next points to Micah 5:2 as evidence that the Messiah would be born in Bethlehem. Jewish interpretation acknowledges that Micah connects Bethlehem with a future ruler from the house of David. However, biblical prophecies are generally evaluated as complete units rather than isolated phrases.

Biblical prophecies are generally evaluated as complete units rather than isolated phrases (A.K.A. not cherry-picked verses).

The surrounding context of Micah, as well as other similar prophecies found within the Tanakh, describes conditions associated with the messianic age, including the restoration of Israel (Israel is an established nation and all Jews return to the land), all humans know the true God of Israel, Torah teachings will be widely-circulated across the globe; thus, the entire planet experiences subsequent security and peace. Since these conditions have not yet been universally realized, Judaism concludes that the prophecy remains unfulfilled. Thus, even if a claimant were connected to Bethlehem, that fact alone would not establish his identity as the Messiah.

(iii) Hosea 11:1 and “Out of Egypt I Called My Son”

Matthew 2:15 applies Hosea 11:1 to Jesus’ return from Egypt following the death of Herod. Yet when Hosea’s words are read in context, the prophet is recounting Israel’s history rather than predicting a future event.

The verse states, “When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called My son.” Throughout the passage, “My son” refers collectively to the nation of Israel and recalls the Exodus from Egypt. Traditional Jewish interpretation therefore understands Hosea’s statement as a reflection on Israel’s past rather than as a prophecy concerning a future individual.

For this reason, Judaism does not view Hosea 11:1 as a prediction of the Messiah.

(iv) Jeremiah 31:15 and Rachel’s Weeping

Matthew 2:18 also cites Jeremiah 31:15 after describing the slaughter of infants in Bethlehem. In Jeremiah, Rachel is poetically portrayed as weeping for her children as the Jewish people are led into the Babylonian exile.

The broader context of Jeremiah 31 is not a prophecy about the Messiah’s birth but a message of comfort and restoration. The chapter promises that the exiles will return to their land and that Israel’s future remains secure despite present suffering.

Because the passage addresses the Babylonian exile and Israel’s eventual redemption, Jewish commentators do not interpret it as a prediction concerning events in the life of Jesus.

(v) “He Shall Be Called a Nazarene”

One of the most challenging passages in Matthew appears in chapter 2, verse 23, where the author writes that Jesus lived in Nazareth “that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, ‘He shall be called a Nazarene.'”

The difficulty is that no such prophecy appears anywhere in the Hebrew Bible. Numerous explanations have been proposed over the centuries, including possible wordplays and allusions to other verses. Nevertheless, there is no direct text in Tanakh stating that the Messiah would be called a Nazarene.

As a result, this citation remains problematic from a Jewish interpretive standpoint.

The Jewish Understanding of the Messiah

Beyond individual prooftexts, Judaism evaluates messianic claims by examining whether the candidate fulfills the biblical mission of the Messiah.

The Hebrew prophets describe a future age in which Israel is gathered from exile, the nations recognize the God of Israel, warfare ceases, and peace becomes established throughout the world. Passages such as Isaiah 2, Isaiah 11, Jeremiah 23, Ezekiel 37, and Micah 4 present a consistent picture of this future redemption.

Because these conditions were not realized during Jesus’ lifetime, traditional Judaism does not identify him as the Messiah. Rather than viewing the messianic mission as divided into multiple appearances, Judaism expects the Messiah to accomplish the biblical objectives associated with that role.

Conclusion

The disagreement between Judaism and Christianity is not merely about a handful of verses quoted in the nativity narrative. It reflects fundamentally different approaches to interpreting the Hebrew Scriptures and understanding the role of the Messiah.

Christians generally view the passages cited by Matthew as fulfilled in Jesus through prophecy, typology, or theological correspondence. Judaism, by contrast, interprets these passages according to their historical context, grammatical meaning, and original audience. From that perspective, Isaiah 7:14, Hosea 11:1, Jeremiah 31:15, and the other texts discussed above do not refer to Jesus and are not understood as messianic prophecies.

For that reason, while the nativity story occupies a central place within Christianity, it is not regarded within Judaism, nor regarded from the perspective of Flip Flop Fellowship, as the fulfillment of the promises concerning the Messiah found in the Hebrew Bible.

Why Asking God for A Sign Is Not Divination

May 8, 2024

When we consider one of God’s many names is El Roi, which means the God who sees me, we can expect this God who sees our ways will help us see His will or way for our lives, and often reveals said ways through the physical. It’s a brilliant juxtaposition for an invisible God to use the visible to know who God is, and to learn to trust Him and His directions for our customized lives. In fact, God often asked the prophets, “What do you see?” to convey an important message to the prophets (Amos 7:7-8; 8:2; Jeremiah 1:11-13) and just as God modeled to the prophets, the prophets frequently conveyed God’s message to the people using the physical. In the Exodus account, God used the physical manifestations to reveal Himself to the enslaved Israelites in Egypt as well as Egyptians, which ultimately prompted the mixed-multitude to vacate Egypt as they followed Moses and the Israelites throughout the wilderness (Exodus 12:38). God also used signs to answer those who sought God such as King Hezekiah. In Isaiah 37, King Hezekiah prays to God for clarity, and God immediately answers when the prophet Isaiah sends a message to King Hezekiah writing, “And this is the sign for you…” (Isaiah 37:30) to which Isaiah describes physical manifestations of agriculture within a specific timeline and the interpretation of said signs. Furthermore, the prophets are called seers in Tanakh because much spiritual insight can be perceived through what we see whether in the physical, a sign, a vision, or dream. Nearly every prophet throughout Tanakh has a visual experience (i.e. burning bush, visions, dreams); hence, the label of seer. Similarly, the Levitical priest used the signs provided through the breastplate of decision when they struggled to make an important decision such as to go to war or not. Through the story of Jonah, we see another example of using the physical for clarity as the sailors cast lots to quickly determine who the problem was as the angry seas threatened their lives (Jonah 1:7). All of these examples found in Tanakh reveal that it is not only acceptable to seek God’s will or clarity for our lives and that God uses the physical human/prophet/priest as well as physical objects and or circumstances, but that said physical beings or objects can be accurate and trustworthy resources of guidance.

And yet, if it was permissible to seek out God’s guidance through a “seer” or man or woman of God and God Himself used physical signs to guide individuals, then why do we read in various Torah commands, such as Leviticus 19:26 or Deuteronomy 18:9-12, as some examples, to not consult divination, soothsayer, ghosts, mediums, or omens? Torah teaches us there are both false prophets and true prophets, who have a spiritual gift, and both the true and counterfeit can frequently perform the same physical acts or see or read a person or interpret a dream or circumstance accurately. Ponder the Exodus story as the Egyptian magicians performed the same spells as they matched the manifestations God made through Moses and Aaron (Exodus 7:22; 8:3) or how the prophets of Baal dualed the prophet Elijah (1 Kings 18) or how Baalam, who was not of Israel, could also accurately see the future and was well-known throughout his region (Numbers 22) or how a different Pharoah consulted Joseph to interpret a dream (Genesis 41) and King Nebuchadnezzar consulted Daniel to interpret the King’s dream (Daniel 2) because their usual people could not do so at that time but normally could. In other words, these gifts of seeing and interpretation, or means of communication with a spiritual realm are real, prevalent, and still exist today; otherwise, there would be no need for God to document these experiences for each generation to learn from and no need to permanently command not to seek out a diviner, medium, ghost, etc. if such things weren’t real. Now that we’ve established these two groups, why is seeking out a seer or perhaps a rabbi or asking God for a sign okay, but forbidden to consult tarot cards, mediums, or psychics, to use some more modern terms?

Like all actions, it boils down to motive. What is the motive of the so-called prophet, seer, medium, psychic, or whatever label given? What is the motive of the seeker? And what is the motive of God?

First, let’s consider God’s motive in our conundrums. Why does God repeatedly welcome and encourage individuals to seek Him in Tanakh? Perhaps by allowing challenging decisions to be made, it provokes an individual to seek out and “trust in the LORD with all our heart and lean not on our own understanding” as Proverbs 3:5-6 bellows. God says in Jeremiah 33:3, “Call to Me, and I will answer you, and I will tell you wonderous things, secrets you have not known.” In fact, through the prophet Isaiah, God chides the House of Israel for making plans without asking Him first (Isaiah 30:1-2). Isaiah reiterates later in 55:6, “Seek the LORD while He can be found, call to Him while He is near.” God’s motive in allowing or creating the circumstances resulting in our internal and external conflicts is to make Himself, His Name, His Sovereignty, His Voice (a.k.a. Torah, His documented voice) known to us (and others around us through our story). Subsequently, these dilemmas we find ourselves in are opportunities to build a healthy relationship of trust between the Creator and the created. But due to our days full of distraction, we often cannot see God in the chaos of our lives – we struggle to pause for anything much less to interpret the various visual clues and what God may be trying to teach us in our surroundings and circumstances. Hence, God’s love for visual reminders like the tzitzits (strings on the corners of the garment Jewish men wear), God’s words on the doorposts (mezuzah), or engraved stone tablets instructing “Remember the Sabbath”, etc. We need visual and tangible reminders because we are visual and tactile learners. Sabbath is a great day to pause and ponder all the visual clues God provided throughout the busy week as we study and learn to walk in God’s Sacred Highway, His light, a.k.a. Torah, all of which is ultimately for our benefit (Isaiah 35:8 sacred highway; Proverbs 6:23 Torah is light; Deuteronomy 6:24 beneficial). God’s motive in it all is a healthy relationship with us and loving-kindness towards us.

Second, what is the motive of the true and false prophets/seers? Throughout Tanakh, individuals failed to seek, trust, and heed God’s guidance. Hence, the role of the true prophet to reflect, correct, and direct wandering souls in God’s heart for them. No true prophet wants to be a prophet for it historically has not ended well for any prophet in Tanakh (i.e. hated, humiliated, imprisoned/captivity, cut in two, stoned, killed in other capacities). The motive of a true profit is an unadulterated love, fear, and respect for God and ultimately, the repentance of others, and ideally, the subsequent relationships others could have with God. Conversely, some prophets are motivated by profit, fame, or power, all of which is forbidden and one clear way to tell if a prophet is true or false is by if they charge for their services like psychics do, and or if they only predict good things to the seeker for they can read the idols of an individual’s heart (Micah 3:11-12; Ezekiel 13-14) whereas a true prophet is all about making God and His commands (Torah) known and that usually is not what people want to hear. In fact, the test of a true prophet is defined in Deuteronomy 13, which warns if a prophet tells you to do away with God’s law (Torah) and or worship another as if he/she/it is God, then you know that prophet is not sent by God. The fake apostle/prophet Paul, the founder of Christianity, taught precisely those violations, and I believe was sent as a test, to which many have failed. In other words, if the voice of an alleged prophet or any other source contradicts Torah, God’s documented voice, then you know that is not truth, not the correct answer. The motive of a diviner, medium, psychic, or false prophet often is rooted in self-centered objectives of financial gain, popularity, or power and control, or all of the above, and therefore, will likely provide welcomed feedback. Ponder the messages preached by mega-churches or bestselling books penned by preachers – they often propel themes of how God can serve you, not how you can serve God. Essentially, false prophets or diviners are forbidden because their motive is to profit from flattering you as they feed your soul with vain promises of prosperity. They cunningly specialize in making you feel as if you are God while they gauge your being (the visual clues you personify) and can easily mislead you into a direction not for you, but against you.

Lastly, what is the motive of the individual, the seeker, that either consults with God directly or consults a true or false prophet/seer/teacher? The seeker is motivated by wanting to avoid unnecessary suffering (healthy fear); some may be motivated by curiosity (like trying out a psychic or tarot card reading); and some may be motived by an authentic ambition to please God as they ask for God’s directions.

In conclusion, seeking God’s guidance for your life through prayer, Scripture, visual clues, or other Torah-modeled resources are not only permissible but encouraged. When seeking clarity, evaluate your motive and the motive of the source you are seeking. As for me, I have come to trust God’s answers or signs when I’ve sought Him for advice. Through it all, because of life’s conundrums and subsequent heart cries of clarity, I am grateful for and adore this God who sees, listens, and answers.

How To Study the Bible

The Bible has many mysteries just awaiting to be solved. One mystery unlocks another and so forth all revealing more and more of God. Here are some ways I found particularly helpful when seeking truth in the Bible.

1. Have an open mind; forget what you were told certain passages mean and simply let Scripture interpret itself.

2. Be willing to be wrong about what you think you know.

3. Don’t be afraid to ask questions. Write your question(s) down or whatever topic you are interested in.

4. Be a Bible Detective. Get a concordance and look up every time that word/subject/topic is mentioned in the Bible. How do those verses define that word/concept/subject?

5. Take copious notes on what you discover with supporting Scripture. Put it into an essay or article..write it out or speak it to help you process and summarize what you discovered.

6. Be a Bible attorney. Build a case both for and against such concept using evidence of various Scripture, then make a judgment based on the evidence. For example, when I went to build a case to prove Jesus is Messiah while still a Christian, that is when the case against Jesus being Messiah mounted with overwhelming and dissapointing evidence.

7. Be a Profiler. Using the Hebrew Bible, make a list of clues and criteria of a type of role such as the profile of a prophet, profile of a messiah, profile of a priest, etc.

8. Enjoy the blessings in what you discover and share with others.

Are the 7 Noahide Laws the Only Commands Gentiles Should Obey?

Both Judaism and Christianity typically teach that God’s 613 commands are exclusively for Jews to obey while Gentiles are only obligated to obey general moral laws such as the “Seven Noahide Laws”. For those unfamiliar with the 7 Noahide Laws, they are as follows:

1) Don’t worship any other god, but the One True Living God (no idols);

2) Don’t curse God;

3) Don’t commit murder/bloodshed;

4) Don’t steal;

5) Don’t commit sexual immorality;

6) Establish a judicial system;

7) Don’t eat the limb/flesh of a living animal.

Some of these principles are established by Noah as instructions to his sons after the family and animals exited the ark upon being the sole survivors of the great flood in Genesis 9 while other alleged laws are assumed. In this chapter of the Bible thought to be the basis for the Noahide Laws, Noah urges his sons and their wives to be fruitful and multiply (Genesis 9:1,7) as did God to Adam and Eve; Noah also informed his sons that the animals, the birds, and fish would be fearful of man, but man has dominion over them all (vs. 2); they can’t eat meat rare (with blood in it – vs. 3); and, lastly, they can’t murder or cause blood to be shed (vs. 5-6). If we were to go strictly by Genesis 9 alone, then, technically, these four commands would be the Noahide Laws. The Jewish sages expanded on them some to establish the seven, and various sects of Christianity have their own set of laws as well.

It is my position that while these Noahide laws are a great place to start, there appear to be hints of other laws Gentiles could obey and Gentiles of the future will obey. Moreover, whether Jew or Gentile, one ought to obey God’s commands, not suggestions, to the best of their ability and understanding out of their love for God. If one devotes their time looking for excuses or develops arguments against obeying God’s commands, therein reveals much, namely one’s heart and alleged reverence for God and His authority in their life.

In the Summer of 2020, I visited the Ark replication in Kentucky. That’s not a fake backdrop – it’s a huge real ark!

With that said, let us look at a few examples of Gentiles obeying what many would consider exclusive Jewish laws or laws not listed in the Seven Noahide Laws.

Sacrifices

First, consider neither Adam, Eve, their sons, nor even Noah were Jewish for the tribes of Israel and therefore, the tribe of Judah, had not existed at this point in the Genesis story, and yet, God evidently commanded or, at the very least, welcomed the first family to offer sacrifices to Him. Hence, the first case of domestic violence and homicide, sadly, as Cain was jealous of Abel’s sacrifice (Genesis 4). Second, notice that Noah understood the importance of sacrifices as he too offered sacrifices as soon as the flood was over (Genesis 8:20-22). Noah also made sure there were clean and unclean animals on the ark presumably for the purpose of making sacrifices and food (Genesis 7:2,8), instructions not yet documented until much later (Leviticus 1-7, 11). Likewise, many years post-flood, Abraham, who also was not technically Jewish, although the first Hebrew, fashioned an altar to worship God (Genesis 12:7; 13:4,18); although the text does not specifically say he also offered sacrifices, it is inferred. Later, when Abraham’s son, Isaac, was older, God tested Abraham’s devotion to God by instructing him to, you could say, lay his idol down as Abraham set out to sacrifice his son as a burnt offering on an altar. Abraham trusted God would provide a better alternative while demonstrating he loved God even more than his miracle-baby. Consequently, God indeed had a better plan and provided a clean animal instead of Isaac (see Genesis 22). Again, all of this took place well before Jews and Judaism existed or God’s commands were documented by Moses.

As another example of Gentiles making sacrifices, in the future, after God somehow physically rescues, regathers, and resurrects the scattered tribes of Israel and reigns on Earth (Zechariah 9-14), the surviving Gentile nations will be required to participate in making sacrifices for the Feast of Tabernacles, or Sukkot in Hebrew, according to Zechariah 14:16-21. Did you catch that? It will be required of Gentiles by God Himself to sacrifice in the future – for Sukkot / Feast of Tabernacles for certain! In that same time period, a temple will exist, according to the prophet Ezekiel in Ezekiel 37-47; so, evidently, Gentiles that survive the Battle of Gog of Magog will be bringing sacrifices to Jerusalem for the Feast of Tabernacles, also known as Sukkot, or Feast of Booths or Feast of Ingathering.

It should be noted that Noah offered sacrifices of praise upon his literal, physical salvation (Genesis 8:20-22) just as the future surviving Gentiles will do upon their literal, physical salvation (Zechariah 14). Likewise, Noah and the other family that survived the flood repopulated the renewed Earth just as the future surviving Gentiles will do.

Sabbath and Other Holy Days

In the previous segment about sacrifices, we briefly explored the Feasts of Tabernacles, a Feast of the LORD, and how it will be celebrated in the World-To-Come, or upon God creating the New Heavens and New Earth, in the New Covenant not yet activated. In Isaiah 66:22-24, we also see the seventh-day Sabbath and the monthly new moon celebrations (Rosh Chodesh) will be observed by “all flesh”, meaning all mankind. The Prophet Ezekiel also predicts during that era God’s Sabbaths and Feasts are obeyed as well as sacrifices by the reunited and resurrected twelve tribes of Israel (see Ezekiel 43-44). It would appear in the future because all of the once scattered Israelites will be fully restored in the Promised Land of Canaan (Israel), God’s laws will also be fully restored while Gentiles obey some additional laws such as the Sabbath and celebrate Sukkot.

Notice the passage says “all flesh”, not just Jews.

Fasting

Fasting is another command not found in the Seven Noahide Laws and yet the Prophet Jonah instructs the Gentiles of Nineveh to fast as a means to demonstrate their repentance. Fasting is a central part of Judaism, particularly on the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur), one of God’s Holy Days found in Leviticus 23, and all about repentance. Apparently, God appreciates the Gentile who fasts as a sign of repentance as well.

Lying

Technically, lying is not one of the Seven Noahide Laws either, but according to Nahum 3:1, the Ninevites (see Nahum 1:1), the ones who fasted and repented as mentioned above, were sinning by lying. In other words, lying was one of the offenses that caused God to send a prophet announcing God’s disapproval of their behavior and their need to repent to be spared from God’s wrath.

Sorcery

Likewise, sorcery was another command the Ninevites evidently violated, according to Nahum 3:4, and yet, is not listed in the Seven-To-Heaven list, or list that deems a Gentile righteous if obeyed according to the traditions of Judaism. Sorcery isn’t even in the 10 Commandments and yet clearly, a no-no, for both Jew and Gentile (Micah 5:11-14).

Unclean Food: No Bacon For You!

The vague translations of Genesis 9 make it sound like Noah’s sons can eat anything, but just the fact that Noah brings both unclean and clean animals on board the ark indicates otherwise. God specifically informed Moses much later what is food and not food in both Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14 for Israelites, but it is interesting Noah understood what animals are clean and unclean before God gave Moses such instructions inferring the knowledge of what God defines as food predated the covenant given at Mt Sinai.

Clearly, God reveals throughout various Scriptures, albeit after carefully studying, that the Seven Noahide Laws may be a great place for Gentiles to start obeying God, but Gentiles should at the very least expect some more in the future (ie. Sukkot sacrifices & Sabbath). Moreover, consider the simple fact that Jews are “chosen” to be the light to the nations (Isaiah 42:6; 49:6) designed to teach the light, being Torah or God’s commands, and all its wisdom and glory to the deceived world (Proverbs 6:23; Psalm 119:18,105-106; Ezekiel 44:23-24; Jeremiah 16:19; Zechariah 8). We also can learn throughout the passages of the prophetic books in the Hebrew Bible, in the future, everyone will know who God is and what He expects (Jeremiah 31) – it will be a time when the whole world, will “learn righteousness” (Isaiah 26:8-10) meaning Torah, God’s definition of light, His instructions on how to be the light, life, and love. Torah will be taught to the nations and consequently, there will be world peace (see Isaiah 2 and Micah 4).

Moreover, whether Jew or Gentile, everyone has specific responsibilities and purpose then, now, and in the future.

In conclusion, in addition to the benefits of learning Torah, it is apparent to me if certain commands were observed by Gentiles before the tribes of Israel were even established and some of the said commands will be observed by the world after all the tribes of Israel are reunited and re-established in the future, then obviously, they are neither done away with, as Christianity teaches, nor only 7 laws for Gentiles as traditional Judaism teaches. Therefore, I do not believe the 7 Noahide Laws are the only commands Gentiles should obey, but rather, it could be a good place to start.

“For this applies to all mankind..”

Fear God, Not Ghosts

The craze to dress up like ghosts, goblins, or some other ghoulish costume continues to haunt Americans, including God-fearing Christians and Jews alike. The lucrative 9-million-dollar American industry tempts even the religious to celebrate the creepy time of the year. What’s more frightening is many, if not most Americans, are unaware of the origins of this spooky holiday, much less what the Hebrew and Christian Bibles say about ghosts or more specifically talking to ghosts.

According to numerous credible internet sources, Halloween essentially originated and still is considered a pagan holiday known as the most ideal day to speak to the dead and as a bonus, the dead may even predict the future for you. Even more fascinating is the Torah, the first five books of both the Hebrew and Christian Bibles, specifically warn against speaking to the dead either on one’s own or through a medium/witch to learn of the future (Exodus 22:17, Leviticus 19:31, 20:6, 27; Deuteronomy 18:10-13). The prophet Isaiah also warns not to do so in Isaiah 8:19-20. Just the fact that God states not to converse with the dead to learn of the future indicates it IS possible to do; otherwise, a command stating not to do so would not be needed. It also infers pagans have been communicating with the dead for thousands of years. Jewish interpretation of these sentiments is that it is permissible to talk to the dead, but not to ask them to reveal the future.

In this painting, King Saul falls prostrate upon seeing the ghost of the Prophet Samuel.

In fact, did you know there is a fascinating story found in 1 Samuel 28:7-25 where King Saul sought out a witch or medium to contact the deceased Prophet Samuel to get advice about what to do about a pending battle? In this story, not only did King Saul break both God’s law and his own law banishing mediums or any other form of witchcraft and sorcery to predict the future, but the medium was successful in summoning the peacefully rested Samuel. The medium was shocked to see the ghost of Samuel for it was then she realized King Saul was in costume and deceived her as he concealed his identity (since he banished such practices). So, the medium worried that King Saul would kill her as a result (see 1 Sam. 28:8 -12). Meanwhile, the ghost of the Prophet Samuel was irate that he was disturbed from Sheol, the place all dead go to (vs 15).

As if all that wasn’t remarkable enough, the Prophet Samuel could STILL prophesize to King Saul WHILE DEAD (vs 19)! Prophet Samuel accurately predicted King Saul would be joining him in death the next day along with King Saul’s descendants.

What we can learn from this Biblical account are a few things:

  1. We have an immortal soul or eternal life, without a belief in Jesus;
  2. Whether you are a righteous person or a wicked person, it appears that when you are dead, you are hanging out awaiting the resurrection to be judged on your deeds, not your mental beliefs (Job 14:10-14; Daniel 12:1-3; Ezekiel 36-37) and not instantly ushered to “heaven” or “hell” – even the Christian Bible teaches as such (see John 3:13; Acts 2:29); also, notice ancient Jews already believed in the immortal soul and the resurrection (except the sadducees) way before Jesus offered it. So, why does Jesus’ claim only followers of him can receive it? ;
  3. The familiar spirit also known as a ghost can be disturbed and communicated with (it’s called a familiar spirit because a ghost is likely familiar with you personally like a deceased loved one);
  4. Some mediums do indeed have a gift or craft for summoning and communicating with the dead;
  5. A ghost can inform you of things you shouldn’t know about or ask about (i.e. like when you are going to die or what tomorrow holds);
  6. And evidently, prophets can still prophesize even when dead! Put another way, your personality and giftings live on even after you’re dead.

In addition to God stating that ghosts exist, many individuals have experienced paranormal or supernatural events, leading them to come to similar conclusions. So, what’s the harm in wanting to reach out to your deceased parent, spouse, or other loved one for advice? After all, haven’t we gotten advice from our loved ones many times before when they were living? While it’s okay to talk to our deceased loved ones, perhaps the One True Living God wants us to seek Him instead for said matters, not the dead.

Moreover, while we are on the topic of ghosts, have you ever wondered if there is a Holy Ghost or Spirit of Holiness, or however you want to label God’s Spirit, then that would indicate there also are unholy ghosts or evil spirits. Otherwise, the adjective of “holy” would not be needed to distinguish that Spirit from other spirits. Perhaps just like there are righteous and evil people, there too are good ghosts and bad ghosts, angels, and demons. Makes sense when you ponder our personalities live on. The problem is both good angels and bad angels, commonly referred to as demons, are allegedly all around as are possibly the dead, so who do we know for certain we are talking to when consulting the dead or when a medium is communicating with them on our behalf? How do we know whatever spirit we are communicating with isn’t a demon in a costume of his own, disguising himself as Aunt Betty, hoping to lead us into destruction?

As we study the Torah, God appears to focus on life, providing little information about death; and yet, validating that the dead live on just without a physical body. Torah teaches the living to seek the Living God for guidance. Go to His instructions (Torah) for answers to life.

To summarize, even though ghosts indeed exist as the immortal souls of those gone before us, we only need to fear God, not ghosts.

👻 Updated 10.30.2023 👻

Questions Every Christian or Messianic Should Investigate

Since we each must give an account for ourselves and ideally should be able to explain one’s faith, I have wrestled with some difficult questions over the years all of which cumulated in this eye-opening year of 2020 vision. This, like all my thought-provoking articles, are not an attack against an individual person, but rather it is exposing what I now see is a false ideology called Christianity, specifically what God labels as idolatry, and moreover, an invitation to dig into the Holy Scriptures for oneself while pondering, praying, and pursuing such critical concepts.

Naturally, when people can’t explain or can’t overcome such objections, they become angry at the person exposing error or at the very least challenging their belief, not realizing the person, such as myself, typically are motivated by love to do so. After all, iron sharpens iron. Nevertheless, I understand the mentality, the passion, and emotion of the Christian, as I, too, was appalled and even angry upon learning such truths below – first, at the person or people sharing, and then, more appropriately my anger became directed at Christianity or idolatry in general for propagating such blatant and now obvious to me fallacies. Though I readily admit, I know not all of God’s truth, for none of us can, today, I am in complete peace (Psalm 119:165), more in love with God and others than ever and daily learning to surrender to God, His will, and His Spirit of Holiness. It has been a long process of truth-seeking that eventually led me to the LORD when I thought I would be leading others to Him! You could say it’s been a journey of flip-flopped faith, though certainly not my intention when I picked the name “Flip Flop Fellowship” for my ministry. God clearly has a sense of all-knowing humor. It is my prayer these questions, as well as my various articles and testimony, spurn you, dear student of the Bible, to continue to seek Abba Father and His will for you with all your being and by continually comparing and examining your will and theology to His as defined in His Holy Scriptures. But I both confess and warn, it is not easy to lay our idols down.

As always, much love, shalom, and blessings! ~Carrie, 10.5.2020

1)What criteria did God give the Israelites regarding how to discern a false prophet, false teacher, or false messiah?

FACT: In Deuteronomy 13, God specifically instructed the Israelites to beware of and test a person based off two criteria: 1) Does the person implore the Israelites to worship any other person, thing, or other gods as “God” for God alone is to be worshiped – not His son, not anybody, or anything but God. 2) Does the person teach that G!d’s instructions being God’s law or Torah is done away with, old, irrelevant? For Israel is only to obey God and His instructions, not man’s, not Paul’s, not Jesus’ commands, but God’s alone.

2) What are the Jews, Israel, or Twelve Tribes of Israel chosen for? “Chosen” to do what exactly and why?

FACT: Israel, being the Twelve Tribes, specifically the Jews, are chosen to make God, His name, and His Torah known. They are chosen to be the light of the world, to set the captives free, so that all the world may also experience salvation. They are chosen as God’s “Servant” (Isaiah 44:1, 21, 45:4, 48:20, 49:3, 52:13) or commissioned to instruct the world in Torah, which the Scriptures define as light itself (Psalm 119:105,130; Proverbs 6:23; Isaiah 62:1-2), the way of salvation or righteousness, and moreover, living a lifestyle of loving God and loving others. According to the prophets, eventually, in the World-To-Come/Messianic Era, they are elevated and honored while some of them are specifically commissioned to help teach Torah to the world as the world “learns righteousness” (Isaiah 26:9-10). See Exodus 19:5; Deuteronomy 6, 7:6-8, 26:17-19; 2 Samuel 7:23-24; Psalm 105; Isaiah 2:1-5; 26:1-12; 32:16-20; 33:20-24; 35:1-10; 42:6-7; 48:17-19; 49:6; 51:4-7; 52:1-2; 62:1-12; 66:5-24; Jeremiah 29-31; Zechariah 8, 12; Ezekiel 44:23-24; Amos 9:11-15; Obadiah 1:15-21; Micah 4:1-5; Joel 3; Zephaniah 3:8-20; Daniel 12:3; Hosea 14. Nearly every prophetic book foretells this glorious event and outcome for the children of Israel, wherever they are scattered in the past, present, and future world!

3) If both Jew and Gentile can be forgiven by simply repenting and striving to keep God’s commands, which are His instructions for life found in Torah, why did Jesus have to die for people’s sins?

FACT: God has always eagerly forgave people who authentically repented. His grace has always been available well before Jesus arrived. See Deuteronomy 4:29-31; 1 Kings 8; 2 Samuel 12 (Did King David have to make a sacrifice for forgiveness of his sin?); Isaiah 1:16-17; 42:6; 43:25; 44:22; 45:22,25 ; 49:10; 55:6-7; Psalms 24:3-6; 25:6,10; 30:5; 32:1,5; 34:22; 36:5,10; 37:18,29,34,37-40; 51:1-4, 7-9 (really all of Psalm 51); 68:19; 72:12-14; Psalm 103; 119:118,132,155-156; 146:17-20; 147:11; Micah 7:18-20; Book of Jonah (notice even the Gentiles had to repent- repent from what? Did they have to have a blood sacrifice for forgiveness?). To study more passages, read this article: Always Have Been Saved By Grace

4) Since forgiveness has been and still is granted without any blood sacrifice and by simply repenting, why did Jesus need to spill his blood as a sacrifice?

FACT: God forgave people with or without blood sacrifices and /or if they only offered other items instead of blood sacrifices such as flour, money, or jewelry when a temple was in place. See passages above in #3 as well as Leviticus 5:11-13 (flour), Exodus 30:15-16 (money), Numbers 31:48-52 (jewelry). The sin sacrifices were a tangible act in order to teach them to not forget God’s instructions/His law like requiring your kid to sacrifice their electronics when they disobey for sin has consequences – best to learn to obey Abba Father/God for our own good (Deuteronomy 5:29; 6:24-25; 10:12-13). To learn more, read this article: Why Jesus Didn’t Die For Anyone’s Sins (but his own)

5) Why would the unknown authors* of the gospels claim Jesus is God’s one and only son (John 3:16) when Scripture reveals the twelve tribes of Israel/the Jewish people (and their descendants) are God’s sons and daughters; therefore, G!d has many sons?

*scholars don’t know for certain who exactly penned each gospel

FACT: When God speaks to the Israelites/Israel/Judah or when the prophets refer to God, God or the prophet often identifies Himself/God as Father inferring He has many sons and daughters – see Deuteronomy 32:6; Isaiah 64:7; Jeremiah 3:19, as a few examples. Similarly, God says in Isaiah 56 that non-Jews/Gentiles/foreigners who choose to enjoin themselves with God and His holy covenant (meaning Torah) by willingly obeying it (Judaism refers to this as “Jews-By-Choice”) are considered “better than sons or daughters” indicating the naturally chosen are sons and daughters while the “Jews-By-Choice”, or adopted if you will, are even more honored and also brought to Mt Zion upon being literally saved, regathered, or resurrected. Also, see Psalm 82:6 and even Jesus referred to his audience of Jews also as sons in John 10 when quoting Psalm 82:6. And yet the mysterious author of John* made it seem like Jesus is the one and only begotten son of God a few chapters earlier in John 3. In other words, Jesus was one of God’s many children.

6) Why would God instruct one of His sons, since Jesus was a Jew, to die for the sins of the world as the New Testament claims when God already informed Israel no person can die for another person’s sins?

FACT: According to Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:1-32; 33:12-20; Jeremiah 31:29-30 (which is also what Eze 18:1-2 says), and Psalm 49:7 no person can die for another persons’ sins even in the New Covenant chapter of Jeremiah 31.

7) Why would God instruct one of His sons, much less God’s other kids, to believe God would offer His child as a sacrifice when God specifically told His kids, being the Israelites, never to offer their children as sacrifices?

FACT: God often instructed the Israelites to not mimic other religions such as offering their children as sacrifices to a god(s), or as a form of worship, and labeled such behavior an abomination. See Leviticus 18:21, 20:3; Deuteronomy 12:29-32; 18:10; 2 Kings 3:27, 16:3, 17:17; 2 Chronicles 28:3, 33:6; Jeremiah 7:31; Psalm 106:35-38; Ezekiel 16:20-21 as some examples.

8) Why are we still teaching each other about who the One True Living God is if we are currently in the New Covenant?

FACT: According to the only chapter in the Holy Scriptures that refers by name a “New Covenant”, found in Jeremiah 31, no one will need to inform one another who God is for all will know Him (see verse 34). Incidentally, most Christians seem to not notice what the ambiguous author of Hebrews pens in chapter 8:13, which says referring to the “old” and “new” covenants, “Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away” inferring the “old” covenant isn’t obsolete or done away with yet because the New Covenant hasn’t manifested just yet -obviously, since there is no world peace and everyone obeying Torah (but more on that later). Equally fascinating, is the New Covenant isn’t activated until there is a New Jerusalem, New Heavens, and New Earth – hence, all the references to “Behold, I will do (future tense) a NEW thing..” Isaiah 43:19. More accurately, RENEWED covenant, RENEWED earth, RENEWED Jerusalem, etc. How interesting God is referring to do a “new thing” upon literally saving Israel from their oppressors and restoring them all to the land of Canaan/Israel as discussed in #2.

8) Why in the New Covenant / World-To-Come / Messianic Era (the future, whatever you want to call it) are there still sacrifices if Jesus was the final sacrifice? Moreover, how can Christians honestly believe another man, namely Paul, when he says God’s laws are a curse and not to be obeyed when clearly it is not just commanded by God, but the future of the world?

FACT: Ezekiel chapters 36-48 describe both the literal resurrection of all of Israel, regathering, and restoration of Israel, both dead and alive, to the land of their inheritance in Israel, a magnificent event nearly all the prophets describe but hasn’t manifested nowhere near its entirety just yet. In this future era, there is a unique temple established along with sacrifices led by the ruler/prince including not just the praise sacrifices, but sin sacrifices as well (see specifically Ezekiel 43-44). Additionally, Zechariah 14:16+ informs us in the future, after God literally physically saves Israel from their enemies, all the remaining survivors of the nations must participate in bringing sacrifices to Jerusalem for the Feast of Tabernacles, or what is known in Hebrew as “Sukkot”, in order for it to rain, or put another way in order for them and their economy to survive. Sukkot is in the Fall (September/October on the Gregorian calendar) and is the initiation of the rainy season. In fact, as I pen this, it is Sukkot, a festival of rejoicing, for one day, it will indeed be a whole new world full of joy and peace! To learn more about the Feasts of the LORD, read Leviticus 23. Also, in Isaiah 65-66 God describes the future and how He wants to be worshiped, as well as how He is specifically angered at those who consume pork, which He instructed not to eat in Leviticus 11; Deuteronomy 14, and describes worship as participating in the Sabbaths and festivals of the LORD in the New Heavens and New Earth (aka New Covenant). Furthermore, Zechariah 8 tells us Gentiles will be clinging to Jews to learn more about God one fine day.

9) Why would the “New Testament” and Christianity be all about propagating one must “believe” Jesus is Messiah in order to be spared from hell and go to heaven when there is absolutely no prophecy in the Hebrew Bible stating one must believe in a future Messiah in order to experience salvation much less the heaven vs hell concept?

FACT: Search the prophets out for yourself, you will not find any prophetic word regarding anyone must believe in a Messiah to be saved. But what you do read in Amos 3:7 is God does nothing without revealing it to His prophets first. Also, you will find a very different definition of salvation unfolds. Plainly said, salvation is a literal, physical experience, not solely spiritual mental ascent, while both salvation and righteousness are repeatedly linked with obeying God’s commands, His laws, His Torah, His Voice. Whereas many passages infer or directly state those who disregard God’s laws are considered wicked (Psalm 50; Psalm 119), without knowledge, and will perish (Hosea 4:6). You will not find in the Hebrew Bible, the Tanakh, the law, and the prophets where salvation is merely a mental belief in a Messiah, but rather reward is based on your conduct, the exact opposite of what the New Testament, namely Paul, teaches.

10) In the early 1990’s, did you believe David Koresh when he claimed to be Messiah? His followers claimed he performed miracles and was prophetic. He and presumably his followers were writing manuscripts to spread his good news, his message. Would you put your trust in him? How about if he and or his roommates, who all tragically and unnecessarily perished, claimed he WAS actually God? Would you pick up your cross and follow him? On what criteria do you judge a person and their message? Is not the Hebrew Bible, the law and prophets, the foundation for which all are to be judged? Hence, the very label “the law”. What makes you put your trust in Jesus, or more accurately, Paul since Christianity is mostly based on Paul’s message and spiritual experience of seeing Jesus in the sky allegedly? Did Jesus, Paul, or other Apostles entice you to worship someone or something other than God, or worse, did Jesus or his followers indicate Jesus WAS/IS God; therefore, replacing God or elevating oneself to be as God or as part of God? Did Jesus, Paul, the other Apostles, or any of their followers, then and now, instruct you to disobey God by not keeping His law? Do you or your church have an Easter ham for dinner, as an example of breaking God’s law? Do you rest, reflect, and spend time with God and family on the 7th day or are you out grocery shopping, mowing the grass, or doing laundry? Does your church celebrate Easter, Halloween, or Christmas, but not the feasts of the LORD, His holy holidays? Why do some, if not all, denominations of Christianity claim everybody should keep the 10 commandments, but not the one about Sabbath or worshiping other gods?

FACT: Every Christian, whether Catholic or Protestant or even Messianic Jew/Gentile, knows that according to the writings of the New Testament, Jesus, but especially Paul as well as the other Apostles and the unknown authors of the gospels, elevated Jesus to be God (John 1), for Jesus to be worshiped and obeyed (Matthew 28:18; Philippians 2; Colossians 2), as well as instructed their audience, their disciples to disregard God’s laws (Galatians 3)or at the very least, the church instructs congregants to disobey most of God’s laws, the eternal law (Psalm 19, 119:142,152,160: Isaiah 2) of then, now, and the future. Hence, eternal. So with all that said, back to Deuteronomy 13, what were the two criteria God specifically said to watch out for? See #1.

“Choose this day whom you will serve.” Joshua 24:15.

Always Have Been Saved By Grace

As one who has traversed Christian circles, “Saved by Grace” is a common phrase indicating one is saved by believing Jesus died for one’s sins and consequently, gets to experience God’s grace or forgiveness. In fact, I used to wear a hat proudly stating this very expression. After discerning more and more of God’s word, and upon realizing the fallacy in the Christian message of Jesus had to die for one’s sins in order to receive God’s grace, I discovered that we always have been saved by God’s grace if only we seek Him and His ways.

In 2020, when I sought to prove Jesus is the Messiah using only the Hebrew Bible, I discovered the Hebrew or Jewish definition of salvation is different than the Christian version of being saved. You can read more about those details here in an article I penned called “What Is Salvation According to the Hebrew and Christian Bibles”. Moreover, I realized upon digging through the Tanakh (or what Christians refer to as the “Old” Testament), that God has always offered His love, grace, forgiveness, and mercy to those who genuinely seek Him and strive to obey Him. Inevitably, we will make mistakes, but all we have to do is authentically repent and try again. Look at King David’s sin of committing adultery and murdering the woman’s husband. Christians have been told only a blood sacrifice can atone for sins, but what did God say to David through the Prophet Samuel in 2 Samuel 12:13-14? God said He forgives David’s sins though there still will be consequences just as any good father would say to his disobedient child. Was there a blood sacrifice David had to make? Did he have to believe in a future Messiah? No. How about when the Prophet Jonah went to the Ninevites or Gentiles to warn them of God’s pending judgment should they not repent and turn to God. Where was their blood sacrifice for God’s grace and forgiveness?

Notice God was demonstrating grace way back when the Prophet Isaiah lived (circa 8 BCE – 7 BCE).

God’s Holy Scriptures never once say anyone needs to “believe” in a Messiah to be saved, much less that one will be coming to die for the world’s sins, which would be a hugely critical prophecy to reveal, don’t you think? If God does nothing without revealing it to His prophets first, according to Amos 3:7, then we can deduce, that the Christian doctrine of Jesus being the Messiah who just had to die for our sins also is nothing except a replica of various pagan concepts. If you are Christian just learning of this, I know your blood is probably boiling right about now as was mine. First, you are angry at the one who enlightens you on said truth, then you become angry towards Christianity for propagating such gross and offensive errors and mourn your deception. Soon afterward though, you encounter a wave of peace and the lifting of a huge burden of guilt and manipulation you had been unknowingly carrying for years believing your sin caused some innocent god-man to die for you. Eventually, you will be so grateful to God for opening your eyes and rescuing you from the popular idolatry of the church. As God’s Spirit whispered to me one day early in 2020, “You can mourn over the lies you once believed or you can rejoice you have finally been set free from them.

I encourage you, dear reader, to dig into the following Scriptures and ask yourself why would God need to send His son, Jesus, to die for one’s sins for forgiveness when these Scriptures clearly indicate God has been forgiving people well before (and still after) Jesus? Why would God instruct His child to be a human sacrifice when He instructed the Israelites to never sacrifice their children like the pagans do (see Leviticus 18:21, 20:3; Deuteronomy 12:29-32; 18:10; 2 Kings 3:27, 16:3, 17:17; 2 Chronicles 28:3, 33:6; Jeremiah 7:31; Psalm 106:35-38; Ezekiel 16:20-21 as some examples)? Why would God cause Jesus to die for another person’s sins when God specifically forbids such things in the law and prophets (see Deuteronomy 24:16; Ezekiel 18:1-32; 33:12-20; Jeremiah 31:29-30; Psalm 49:7)? Also, why does the famous “New Covenant” chapter state everyone will still be dying for their own sins in the new covenant (see Jeremiah 31:30)? Shouldn’t that be an opportune time to state no one will need to die for their sins because a Messiah will do so for them?

Below is a list of some passages that reveal many over the course of history always have been saved by God’s grace.

  • Genesis 4:8-16 (God forgave and even protected Cain)
  • Exodus 30:15-16 (money not blood sacrifice)
  • Exodus 34:6-7
  • Leviticus 5:11-13 (flour used not blood sacrifice)
  • Numbers 16:46-47 (incense)
  • Numbers 31:48-52 (jewelery)
  • Deuteronomy 4:29-31
  • 1 Kings 8 & 2 Chronicles 6 (notice both Jews and Gentiles are forgiven even without a temple/sacrifices)
  • 2 Samuel 12 (God forgave King David w/o blood sacrifices)
  • Book of Jonah – Jonah 3:8-10 (How is it the Gentiles could get forgiveness without a blood sacrifice?)
  • Isaiah 1:11-17 (sacrifices & other forms of obedience are phony without true repentance – doing good & just is what God wants)
  • Isaiah 27:9 (removal of idols atones)
  • Isaiah 42:6; 43:23-25; 44:22; 45:22,25 ; 49:10; 55:6-7
  • Isaiah 56: Notice even Gentiles/Foreigners who align themselves with God’s Covenant (i.e. keep Sabbath) are brought to Mount Zion one day and honored even more so than natural-born Jews for doing so.
  • Jeremiah 29:11-14; 31:3; 33:3,6-8,19-26; 50:4-5,20
  • Ezekiel 16:60-63; 18:19-32; 33:12-20; Chps 36-37
  • Micah 7:18-20
  • Hosea 14:2/3 (depending on Hebrew or Christian Bible you are using)
  • Daniel 4:24/27 (depending on Hebrew or Christian Bible you are using)
  • Lamentations 3:22-23
  • Psalms 24:3-6; 25:6-11; 30:5; 32:1,5; 34:22; 36:5,10; 51:1-4, 7-9 (really all of Psalm 51); 103; 119:132,155-156; 141:2; 145:17-20; 147:11
  • Proverbs 16:6; 21:3
  • Job 22:23
  • Why Jesus Didn’t Die For Your Sins
  • Why the New Testament Is Not the Inerrant Word of G!d

To download this list of Scriptures for your own studies.

Ponder & Pray | Zechariah 8

Zechariah 8 is a short and sweet chapter telling the people of Israel (and readers), one fine day, God will dwell in Jerusalem. At that time, He will end antisemitism and instead, not only bless the reunited 12 twelve tribes of Israel (House of Judah and House of Israel), but vindicate them. There are many chapters in the Hebrew Bible that describe a miraculous regathering or reuniting of the scattered Israelites across the globe, both the living and the dead, bringing them all to heaven on earth being Jerusalem (such as Ezekiel 36-37; Jeremiah 29-31). Also, notice the section of Zechariah 8:16, a prophecy about the very end of time as we know it. Right after the LORD describes and promises Israel’s future literal salvation, what does He instruct the must the Jews/Israel do in the meantime? Believe in the Messiah? Believe in God’s Son yet to be born (at the time this chapter of Zechariah was written)? Believe in Jesus? No, essentially, live righteously – obey the principles of Torah. Shouldn’t the concept of believing in Jesus to pay for your sins or even just stating “Believe in The Messiah” be inserted in this epic moment leading up to their salvation? I encourage you to pray and ponder as to why there is nothing like that mentioned in the Tanakh/Hebrew Bible/Old Testament and yet, Amos 3:7 says the Lord does nothing without revealing it to His prophets first. Moreover, always get in God’s word for yourself and ask Abba Father (Jeremiah 3:19) lots of questions. He will show you things you did not know (Jeremiah 33:3) as He does with me and many others.

Ask yourself and Abba Father (Jeremiah 3:19), why after He dwells on earth in Jerusalem described in Zechariah 8, the entire globe is seeking not just God in Jerusalem, but clinging to Jews, specifically their tallits, which are the garments with tzits-tzits attached (see Zechariah 8:23 below)? These are commanded by God to be worn and are symbols to help them remember the importance of obeying God’s commands (see Numbers 15:37-41).


Think about the connection –> At this future moment, people will be clinging to the Jews realizing God is with them. Notice the verse of Zechariah 8:23 specifically state people will be grabbing onto the Jew’s garment corners as if the prophecy is telling us people will cling to Jews and God’s Torah, which has already started to manifest today. God’s ways are found in His commands, His Torah, His instructions for living, which not only is His will, but they are the light (Psalm 119:105-106, Proverbs 6:23) and the Jews/Israel are called to be the light to the nations (Isaiah 42:6; 49:6). Hence, what they are chosen to do: Be the light – lead in love as they live by Torah.


Why doesn’t the prophet Zechariah describe the New heavens and New earth or New Jerusalem or New Covenant era (notice all the “NEW”s -pun intended) as…”And in that day the Christians will be the light of the world teaching people how to decorate Christmas trees, how to have successful Easter egg hunts and stand in line for the best Heavenly Ham, how to plan a great turn-out for Trunk or Treats, or teaching them about communion, how to successfully and secretly slip up that repentant hand and inwardly profess the sinner’s prayers without anyone knowing then or later, or how to memorize the Lord’s prayer, how to evangelize by handing out tracks about God’s son, how to go on mission trips and build things but tear down with our words..”, or whatever other definition Christians used to define as being the light?

I don’t think it’s possible for any of us, whether Jew or Gentile, to ponder and know God’s truth in it’s entirety, much less live it precisely as He intended it here and now, for how can we know infinite truth and all His thoughts or ways? But we do know truth is what He chose to reveal in the Tanakh and that is: Israel is chosen and God’s Torah is the light for all eternity. So much so the non-Jews will be looking to Jews and the instructions God gave them for guidance.

Carrie R. Turner, 9.3.2020

Detective of the Divine: The Case of the Resurrection

Imagine investigating a missing-person case. Several witnesses come forward. Each insists they were present at the scene, yet their accounts differ significantly regarding who was there, what happened, and when events occurred. As an investigator, would you confidently close the case based solely on those testimonies?

This is the question I found myself asking while examining the New Testament accounts of Jesus’ resurrection.

The resurrection is presented as the defining event of Christianity. If true, it would be one of the most important events in human history. Therefore, it deserves careful scrutiny. As a student of Scripture and a self-described “Detective of the Divine,” I approached the Gospel accounts looking for consistency, corroboration, and evidence.

What I discovered was not a single, unified testimony but a collection of narratives that differ in noteworthy ways. The Gospels disagree about how many women came to the tomb, when they arrived, who they encountered there, and when Jesus allegedly appeared to them. While Christians often argue that differing details demonstrate independent testimony, investigators also recognize that significant contradictions can raise questions regarding reliability.

The purpose of this article is not to mock faith or attack sincere believers. Rather, it is to examine the evidence and ask whether the resurrection accounts meet the standard of proof one would expect for such an extraordinary claim.

Let us dissect and discuss…But first, grab your New Testament.

Consider how and when the women saw the resurrected Jesus such as: In Matthew 28:1-8, Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary” came to the tomb around dawn the day after Sabbath and experienced an earthquake when an angel came down from heaven and personally rolled away the stone. Supposedly it scared the guards, plural, to death paralyzing them in fear. In Mark 16, after Sabbath was over, early in the morning, when the sun had risen, Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James (and Jesus), and Salome brought spices to anoint the body. At first, they were perplexed as to who will roll the stone away for them, but when they arrived, the stone was already rolled away for them. What happened to the earthquake and seeing the angel descend? The speculated but not proven author of Mark skips over that detail. Seems like a highly important detail to somehow forget. Upon arriving at the open tomb, they see a young man inside. No mention of the guards in that version.

A few verses earlier, evidently the tomb’s stone is able to be moved by just 1 person since Joseph (not Mary’s husband) rolled it himself in Mark 15:46 so that leads me to believe 2 or 3 women could have rolled it if just 1 man could have. In Luke 24, on the 1st day of the week, very early in the morning, certain women and “other women with them” so now we have a group of women went to the tomb with spices to anoint the body. Upon arriving, like in Mark, but unlike in Matthew, they discover the stone is already rolled away. After going inside the tomb, suddenly not 1 man as recounted in Mark, but in Luke’s version 2 men were inside the tomb.In John’s version found in John 20, he describes just 1 woman went to the tomb, Mary Magdalene, while it was still dark so not at dawn or after dawn like the other versions describe. No mention of any earthquake nor other women or 1 or 2 men or angels are told to us in John’s version, but we do learn Peter and another disciple race to the tomb and reveal another interesting clue and that is that the linens Jesus was wrapped in were neatly folded within the tomb (John 20:5-7). Verse 9 of John 20 states the disciples did *not* know of any Scripture (in Tanakh) prophesying the Messiah must rise from the dead because there is none. Rather, the Messiah is to bring world peace, unity, and elevate the Jews to assist in teaching Torah to the world as a light to the nations (Isaiah 2, 11, 42, 49, 53-56 among others).

Also, we learn in John’s version that both Joseph and the Pharisee Nicodemus wrapped and anointed Jesus’ body in spices (John 19:38-42) upon his burial. If Nicodemus and Joseph already anointed Jesus’ body, then why did the women need to come again to do so at the time of his burial in Luke 23:56 PRIOR to Sabbath and why did the women return to do so AGAIN AFTER Sabbath as defined in Mark 16:1? Matthew writes about a guard or guards being there to seal the stone whereas none of the other gospels do; Joseph rolled the tomb in place; Yet, the women wondered how they would unroll the stone as if impossible to do so- then why come to anoint him in the wee hours of the morning or at dawn, depending on which version, if the stone cannot be unrolled and if they cannot unroll it themselves? This does not make sense.

Assuming Jesus lived and died though there are no historical writings of such events (read Was the New Testament Inspired by God or Rome), clearly, his body was missing or the Pharisees and Romans could have simply opened the tomb to dispute the claim of the resurrection. I suppose they still could have done so, but we know not of historical documents stating this theory so for the sake of argument, let’s say Jesus indeed existed, died, and the body was indeed missing. Conversely, had the Pharisees or other Jews or the Romans discovered Jesus indeed did resurrect from the dead, wouldn’t that have been the catalyst to producing far more believers instantly rather than just a small group who were already Jesus’ fans? How come we have no documentation of detailed accounts of the resurrected Jesus appearing to any of the alleged 500 Paul claims though Paul didn’t even personally know Jesus (1 Corinthians 15:5-8)? Not to mention Paul’s order of appearance list also contradicts the gospels. There is no account of Jesus revealing himself to anyone but primarily the women first, then some men, IF any of that is even true. Wouldn’t the resurrected Messiah be sure to reveal himself to his accusers? To those who didn’t believe him? Wouldn’t that be far more magnificent and noteworthy to propel God’s mission? Wouldn’t that be far more effective and critical in sharing the ‘good news’ of the gospel, particularly to the so-called lost sheep Jesus was sent to (Matthew 15:24) as in the Jews?

Let’s say for the sake of argument, the Pharisees or Romans inspected the tomb and verified Jesus’ body was missing. Is it not possible though that the body was removed? Who would have the most motive to remove Jesus’ body?

We are told the disciples did not believe the women when they came to them to report Jesus’ body was removed. Also, interestingly enough in John’s version, found in John 20:1-2, Mary Magdalene runs to the disciples to tell them, “They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid him.” Wow! Did she see him or not? In other accounts, she ran into Jesus either at the tomb or upon leaving the tomb prior to seeing the disciples (Matthew 28:7-10; Mark 16:8-11). In John’s version, she runs to the disciples first to tell them Jesus’ body is missing, but then later, after Peter and another disciple inspect the tomb, Mary Magdalene speaks to two angels and Jesus appears to her, which she then ran to the disciples again to report what happened (John 20:11-18). Do you see the confusion in the timetable and details of the various gospels?

These many different accounts of the same epic moment seem suspicious and become less credible the more the reader compares the testimony of the so-called witnesses. But back to motive…the disciples, being men of various trades, although disappointed and humiliated, could easily have gone back to their occupations. However, there is one person in particular who had EVERYTHING to lose if Jesus did not rise again. Mary, Jesus’ mother, not only would have been financially ruined if Jesus did not rise from the dead being her other sons would be the laughing stock of town, but she could have been stoned per the law being now the truth she was not “miraculously impregnated” by the Holy Spirit but rather by Joseph or whomever. Is it not strange the women knew where Jesus’ body was being each account testifies the women were there when he was placed in the tomb unlike the disciples, AND showed up either in the middle of the night or at the crack of dawn to anoint his body when they or Nicodemus already did so while allegedly not knowing how they would open the tomb themselves, AND there are so many different versions of the details of what happened next, AND the linens just happen to be folded neatly all pointing to the women?! Is it not possible wanting to spare Mary, the mother of Jesus and their friend, the women got together to remove the body under the guise of anointing the body, folded the linens neatly in place upon unwrapping them, and then after making it look like he vanished, ran to the men to tell them their many different versions of what happened?

Could the women be bringing anointing oils because Jesus wasn’t actually dead? Were they using these oils for medicinal purposes? Why use such oils on a dead body? Were the women coming to where his body lay to nurse him back to health? Could Jesus have walked off on his own or with assistance?

Furthermore, could the women or men have hallucinated having been under great post-traumatic stress? Could they have seen a ghost as some versions express? How many reports are there in modern ages of people seeing their dead loved one’s ghost or ghosts in general? Plenty, interestingly enough. There even is a ghost story in 1 Samuel 28:11-19 where the medium saw the ghost of the Prophet Samuel, much to her horror. The ghost of Prophet Samuel was recognizable, had a physical appearance, could clearly communicate, and EVEN still give a prophecy to King Saul, and yet, the dude was still technically dead! So could the disciples have seen and likewise conversed with Jesus’ ghost?

Could they have concocted seeing Jesus or could they have been deceived into seeing someone else posing as Jesus since they did not recognize him? Or could have the unknown authors of the gospels created the story themselves since there is no other documentation of Jesus’ life let alone a resurrection? Why would not people document the most epic event in all human history – his miraculous resurrection?! Even if he actually did rise again, others in the Tanakh/Old Testament rose again such as Elijah resurrected children (1 Kings 17 & 2 Kings 4), does that make Elijah or those children THE MESSIAH? Even so, Jesus still doesn’t fit the majority of the profile of the Messiah as described by the prophets-besides being born in Bethlehem (Micah 5).

Also, if Jesus did rise from the dead, Matthew 7:53 says the graves were opened and there were numerous resurrected people walking around. What happened to those people? How come NO ONE ELSE documented anywhere that historians know of this hugely monumental event? Maybe because it is largely fiction just as has been proven about Herod’s non-existent census. 

Moreover, why create a following and rise from the dead just to vanish? If Jesus actually did exist and survived the crucifixion, isn’t it possible Jesus could just have disappeared so the Romans couldn’t properly kill him off?

Or, is it possible all of it is fiction?

Detective’s Final Report

After reviewing the available evidence, I am left with several observations:

  1. The resurrection narratives contain notable differences regarding the participants, timing, and sequence of events.
  2. The Gospel accounts are formally anonymous writings. While church tradition later attributed them to specific individuals, the texts themselves do not identify their authors.
  3. Independent contemporary documentation of the resurrection event itself is lacking. This is especially significant given the extraordinary nature of the claims.
  4. The resurrection claim must ultimately be evaluated alongside the broader question of whether Jesus fulfilled the messianic expectations described throughout the Tanakh.
  5. From a Jewish perspective, the primary test of messiahship is not whether someone performed miracles or was believed to have risen from the dead, but whether that individual fulfilled the prophetic mission assigned to the Messiah: gathering the exiles of Israel, establishing universal peace, rebuilding Jerusalem, and bringing the nations to knowledge of the One God.

As a result, I do not find the evidence sufficient to conclude that the resurrection accounts establish Jesus as the promised Messiah of Israel. The accounts may reflect sincere beliefs, evolving traditions, misunderstandings, or theological interpretations developed over time. However, as a Detective of the Divine, I must follow the evidence where it leads.

For me, the case remains unresolved on historical grounds and unproven on biblical grounds. When measured against the standards established in the Hebrew Scriptures, the messianic claim remains unsubstantiated.

As such, I close my notebook and consider this case closed, or you could say dead.

~Carrie Renee, Revised 6.17.2026; originally published August 28-29, 2020